Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306e4
Core
Skylake-Y
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
4,5 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
633.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
10.53k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
9.98k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
3.4k (x0.64)
TOTAL
33.86k
27.92k (x0.82)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
247.05k (x14.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
264.43k (x10.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
111.01k (x18.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
10.66k (x1.91)
TOTAL
53.58k
633.14k (x11.82)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4