Core m7-6Y75 vs i3-1115G4
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.9 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.9 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
806c1
Core
Skylake-Y
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4,5 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
137.96k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
14.65k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
21.57k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
9.93k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
8.02k (x1.51)
TOTAL
33.86k
54.18k (x1.6)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
32.14k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
43.54k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
19.58k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
5.61k (x1.01)
TOTAL
53.58k
100.87k (x1.88)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
1148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
1555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
699 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
200 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
3602 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
5262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1956 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
13214 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4