Core m3-7Y30 vs i7-4500U
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4500U is 1.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4500U is 1.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
40651
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
66.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
16.67k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
9k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
3.75k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.6k (x0.83)
TOTAL
25.6k
33.02k (x1.29)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
31.77k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
21.36k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
7.95k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.06k (x0.91)
TOTAL
52.78k
66.14k (x1.25)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
4410 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4