Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake
Picasso
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
11.13k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
19.38k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.47k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.87k (x0.9)
TOTAL
25.6k
38.85k (x1.52)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
17.13k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
30.56k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
9.44k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
4.09k (x0.74)
TOTAL
52.78k
61.23k (x1.16)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4