Core m3-7Y30 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.8 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.8 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake
Picasso
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4.5 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
13.02k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
20.56k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.81k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
5.43k (x1.26)
TOTAL
25.6k
43.82k (x1.71)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
27.29k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
49.37k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
13.57k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.61k (x1.01)
TOTAL
52.78k
95.84k (x1.82)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4