Core m3-7Y30 vs A9 9420
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
46.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
11.74k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
16.05k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
3.26k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.05k (x0.48)
TOTAL
25.6k
33.09k (x1.29)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
18.57k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
20.11k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
5.27k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
2.38k (x0.43)
TOTAL
52.78k
46.33k (x0.88)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4