| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.9 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
84.54k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
592.86k points
311.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900KF
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
33.03k
16.86k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
29.52k
12.08k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.55k
3.37k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
6.29k (x0.41)
TOTAL
84.54k
38.61k (x0.46)

Multithread

i9-9900KF

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
276.22k
150.99k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
250.61k
118.54k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
57.2k
33.44k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.84k
8.6k (x0.97)
TOTAL
592.86k
311.57k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i9-9900KF
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2638 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6241 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900KF
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
6605 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3090 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16909 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4