Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Description
The i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a70f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
84.54k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
592.86k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900KF
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
33.03k
31.57k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
29.52k
25.2k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.55k
12.42k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
21.93k (x1.42)
TOTAL
84.54k
91.11k (x1.08)
Multithread
i9-9900KF
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
276.22k
265.26k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
250.61k
226.13k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
57.2k
114.46k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.84k
16.49k (x1.87)
TOTAL
592.86k
622.34k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i9-9900KF
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2638 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
6241 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900KF
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6605 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3090 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
16909 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4