| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 402.4 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
12 /24
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
3.44k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
9.54k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
4.21k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
3.94k (x0.29)
TOTAL
45.53k
21.13k (x0.46)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
73.17k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
230.83k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
107.14k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
7.99k (x0.89)
TOTAL
266.82k
419.12k (x1.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
10.64k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
9.53k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
4.12k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
3.62k (x0.25)
TOTAL
65.37k
27.91k (x0.43)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
252.69k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
238.68k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
115.5k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
10.98k (x1.22)
TOTAL
400.83k
617.84k (x1.54)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
10.53k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
9.98k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
4k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
3.4k (x0.25)
TOTAL
65.24k
27.92k (x0.43)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
247.05k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
264.43k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
111.01k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
10.66k (x1.2)
TOTAL
402.41k
633.14k (x1.57)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1378 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2195 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
4236 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3596 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5408 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2720 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
13049 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4