| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
4.3k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
16.56k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
5.25k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
12.61k (x0.92)
TOTAL
45.53k
38.72k (x0.85)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
18.1k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
79.16k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
26.75k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
13.81k (x1.54)
TOTAL
266.82k
137.82k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
26.28k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
23.38k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.52k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
12.96k (x0.87)
TOTAL
81.91k
68.14k (x0.83)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
163.67k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
159.74k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
39k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
7.56k (x0.62)
TOTAL
529.32k
369.97k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4