Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.2 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.2 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a70f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
31.57k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
25.2k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
12.42k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
21.93k (x1.46)
TOTAL
81.91k
91.11k (x1.11)
Multithread
i9-9900K
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
265.26k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
226.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
114.46k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
16.49k (x1.35)
TOTAL
529.32k
622.34k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4