| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.8 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
3.41k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
15.96k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
4.69k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
17.42k (x1.26)
TOTAL
45.53k
41.47k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
20.88k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
110.37k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
39.25k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
6.66k (x0.74)
TOTAL
266.82k
177.16k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
13.76k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
23.03k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.12k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
15.23k (x1.02)
TOTAL
81.91k
57.13k (x0.7)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
83.23k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
161.06k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
40.52k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
6.73k (x0.55)
TOTAL
529.32k
291.53k (x0.55)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4