Core i9-9900K vs i9-13900K
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
b0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
October 2018
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
9.77k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
24.52k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
17.17k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
21.37k (x1.55)
TOTAL
45.53k
72.83k (x1.6)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
145.21k (x3.99)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
444.95k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
318.3k (x5.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
27.2k (x3.03)
TOTAL
266.82k
935.66k (x3.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
31.93k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
31.54k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
18.8k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
20.82k (x1.44)
TOTAL
65.37k
103.09k (x1.58)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
522.07k (x3.97)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
584.17k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
344.38k (x6.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
25.36k (x2.82)
TOTAL
400.83k
1475.97k (x3.68)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
31.8k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
32.83k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
18.37k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
21.13k (x1.55)
TOTAL
65.24k
104.13k (x1.6)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
532.97k (x4.07)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
596.78k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
342.96k (x6.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
28.6k (x3.21)
TOTAL
402.41k
1501.31k (x3.73)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
58.6k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
33.29k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
17.77k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
19.49k (x1.3)
TOTAL
81.91k
129.15k (x1.58)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
804.04k (x3.31)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
613.45k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
311.08k (x5.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
34.5k (x2.82)
TOTAL
529.32k
1763.08k (x3.33)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4