| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.2 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
b0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Coffee Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
95 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
53.69k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
28.76k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
14.93k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
15.47k (x1.03)
TOTAL
81.91k
112.85k (x1.38)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
526.44k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
420.48k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
196.13k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
17.68k (x1.45)
TOTAL
529.32k
1160.72k (x2.19)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4