| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i7-13700HX


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
b06f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Coffee Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
95 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
27.23k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
27.1k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
15.65k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
15.52k (x1.14)
TOTAL
65.24k
85.5k (x1.31)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
277.49k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
360.68k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
173.57k (x3.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
25.19k (x2.83)
TOTAL
402.41k
836.93k (x2.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
48.57k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
28.78k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
15.6k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
16.46k (x1.1)
TOTAL
81.91k
109.41k (x1.34)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
486.01k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
386.1k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
173.21k (x3.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
25.08k (x2.05)
TOTAL
529.32k
1070.39k (x2.02)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4