| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i3-13100F


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
b06f5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Coffee Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
47.14k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
25.77k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
13.25k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
14.77k (x0.99)
TOTAL
81.91k
100.94k (x1.23)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
168.51k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
142.8k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
63.57k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
15.34k (x1.26)
TOTAL
529.32k
390.23k (x0.74)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4