Core i9-9880H vs i5-4200U
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-4200U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 6.6 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 6.6 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
40651
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
28.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
57.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
14.74k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
7.75k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
3.27k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
3.09k (x0.22)
TOTAL
73.53k
28.85k (x0.39)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
27.66k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
18.65k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
7.17k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.36k (x1.03)
TOTAL
381.53k
57.84k (x0.15)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
1844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
1243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
291 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
3856 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
5669 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
2980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
11095 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4