Core i9-9880H vs i3-10105
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
28.9k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
5.88k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
8.29k (x0.58)
TOTAL
73.53k
68.92k (x0.94)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
111.69k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
110.23k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
28.45k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
3.56k (x0.84)
TOTAL
381.53k
253.93k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4