| | | | | | |

Core i9-9880H vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2.2 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
13.77k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
22.62k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.91k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
73.53k
45.3k (x0.62)

Multithread

i9-9880H

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
50.44k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
94k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
25.64k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.11k (x0.97)
TOTAL
381.53k
174.19k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i9-9880H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4