Core i9-9880H vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 6.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 6.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
11.13k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
19.38k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.47k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
3.87k (x0.27)
TOTAL
73.53k
38.85k (x0.53)
Multithread
i9-9880H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
17.13k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
30.56k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
9.44k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.09k (x0.97)
TOTAL
381.53k
61.23k (x0.16)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4