Core i9-9880H vs i3-13100F
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
b06f5
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
47.14k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.77k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
13.25k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
14.77k (x1.04)
TOTAL
73.53k
100.94k (x1.37)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
168.51k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
142.8k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
63.57k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
15.34k (x3.62)
TOTAL
381.53k
390.23k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4