| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900K vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900K gets a score of 1756.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 2.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
806d0
Core
Raptor Lake-
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
24576 kB
Date
October 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
137.37k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
1756.59k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
63.55k
30.84k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
32.3k
26.38k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.92k
12.66k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.61k
11.74k (x0.52)
TOTAL
137.37k
81.62k (x0.59)

Multithread

i9-14900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
813.87k
294.86k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
608.32k
280.92k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
313.09k
113.9k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.31k
20.16k (x0.95)
TOTAL
1756.59k
709.85k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i9-14900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6511 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4867 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2505 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
14053 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
10591 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5383 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3153 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3768 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
22895 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4