Core i9-14900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900K gets a score of 1756.6 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 3.6 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900K gets a score of 1756.6 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 3.6 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
137.37k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1756.59k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900K
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
63.55k
16.77k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
32.3k
26.29k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.92k
8.79k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.61k
22.51k (x1)
TOTAL
137.37k
74.35k (x0.54)
Multithread
i9-14900K
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
813.87k
167.94k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
608.32k
209.85k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
313.09k
94.41k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.31k
11.27k (x0.53)
TOTAL
1756.59k
483.47k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i9-14900K
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6511 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4867 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2505 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
14053 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-14900K
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10591 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5383 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3153 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3768 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
22895 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4