Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
306f2
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
18/36
12/24
TDP
165 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
20.96k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
11.74k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.61k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
3.4k (x0.33)
TOTAL
68.33k
40.71k (x0.6)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
531.68k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
342.28k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
133.22k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
9.19k (x0.4)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1016.36k (x0.82)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4