| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i9-14900K


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
18/36
24/32
TDP
165 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2019
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1756.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
63.55k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
32.3k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
18.92k (x3.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
22.61k (x2.21)
TOTAL
68.33k
137.37k (x2.01)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
813.87k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
608.32k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
313.09k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
21.31k (x0.93)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1756.59k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
14053 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4