| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 1.3 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a60f12
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raphael
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM5
Cores/Threads
18/36
16/32
TDP
165 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
131072 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1597.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
6.05k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
23.41k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
16.49k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
34.35k (x3.56)
TOTAL
37.6k
80.3k (x2.14)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
128.82k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
465.79k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
289.43k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
75.23k (x3.4)
TOTAL
639.48k
959.27k (x1.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
26.86k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
30.05k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
16.15k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
31.74k (x3.58)
TOTAL
52.05k
104.8k (x2.01)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
430.6k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
545.91k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
289.57k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
64.33k (x2.91)
TOTAL
929.85k
1330.41k (x1.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
40.61k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
31.82k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
16.63k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
32.28k (x3.16)
TOTAL
68.33k
121.33k (x1.78)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
683.17k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
563.45k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
286.77k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
64.4k (x2.8)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1597.79k (x1.29)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
9399 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4