| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the 5950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a20f12
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
16/32
TDP
165 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
November 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
19.88k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
25.26k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
10.77k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
23.59k (x2.31)
TOTAL
68.33k
79.51k (x1.16)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
349.53k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
470.67k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
207.28k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
33.13k (x1.44)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1060.62k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4