Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 7 5800U
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.9 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.9 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a50f00
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
314.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
18.34k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.78k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
9.45k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
20.59k (x2.02)
TOTAL
68.33k
71.16k (x1.04)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
102.74k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
143.27k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
58.13k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
10.41k (x0.45)
TOTAL
1241.12k
314.55k (x0.25)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
20970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4