Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.6 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.6 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
32768 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.2k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.36k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
7.5k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
23.79k (x2.47)
TOTAL
37.6k
52.85k (x1.41)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
22.11k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
108.04k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
56.81k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
36.39k (x1.65)
TOTAL
639.48k
223.36k (x0.35)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
15.38k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
21.94k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
7.97k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
24.76k (x2.64)
TOTAL
55.38k
70.05k (x1.26)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
96.91k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
135.12k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
70.39k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
56.43k (x2.54)
TOTAL
973.92k
358.85k (x0.37)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
15.04k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
20.95k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
8.57k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
21.71k (x2.45)
TOTAL
52.05k
66.27k (x1.27)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
94.36k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
141.73k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
69.38k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
32.72k (x1.48)
TOTAL
929.85k
338.19k (x0.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
16.04k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
24.47k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
8.38k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
21.66k (x2.12)
TOTAL
68.33k
70.55k (x1.03)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
113.63k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
143.55k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
63.84k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
27.34k (x1.19)
TOTAL
1241.12k
348.35k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4