| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i9-13980HX


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.1 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
18/36
24/32
TDP
165 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1317.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
54.07k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
30.22k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
15.67k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
16.09k (x1.58)
TOTAL
68.33k
116.05k (x1.7)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
597.18k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
466.55k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
225.13k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
28.67k (x1.25)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1317.53k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
23955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4