Core i9-10980XE vs i9-13900KS
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
18/36
24/32
TDP
165 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1708.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
57.69k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
33.34k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
17.55k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
18.76k (x1.84)
TOTAL
68.33k
127.35k (x1.86)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
757.76k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
626.83k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
294.93k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
29.05k (x1.26)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1708.56k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
11390 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4