| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i7-13700HX


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b06f2
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
18/36
16/24
TDP
165 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
27.23k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
27.1k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
15.65k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
15.52k (x1.75)
TOTAL
52.05k
85.5k (x1.64)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
277.49k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
360.68k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
173.57k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
25.19k (x1.14)
TOTAL
929.85k
836.93k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
48.57k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
28.78k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
15.6k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
16.46k (x1.61)
TOTAL
68.33k
109.41k (x1.6)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
486.01k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
386.1k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
173.21k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
25.08k (x1.09)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1070.39k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4