| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-2223


Description
Both models i9-10940X and W-2223 are based on Cascade Lake architecture.

Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 4.5 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
50657
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
165 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
8448 kB
Date
November 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
25.09k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
20.76k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
5.07k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
8.76k (x0.97)
TOTAL
72.04k
59.68k (x0.83)

Multithread

i9-10940X

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
111.43k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
100.2k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
24.67k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
6.89k (x0.41)
TOTAL
1088.11k
243.18k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4