| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806d0
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
30.84k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
26.38k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
12.66k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
11.74k (x1.3)
TOTAL
72.04k
81.62k (x1.13)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
294.86k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
280.92k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
113.9k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
20.16k (x1.19)
TOTAL
1088.11k
709.85k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4