| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 1 times faster than the 5950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a20f12
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/28
16/32
TDP
165 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
November 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
19.88k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
25.26k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
10.77k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
23.59k (x2.61)
TOTAL
72.04k
79.51k (x1.1)

Multithread

i9-10940X

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
349.53k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
470.67k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
207.28k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
33.13k (x1.96)
TOTAL
1088.11k
1060.62k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4