| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i9-10940X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
14/28
24/32
TDP
165 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
53.69k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
28.76k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
14.93k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
15.47k (x1.71)
TOTAL
72.04k
112.85k (x1.57)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
526.44k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
420.48k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
196.13k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
17.68k (x1.04)
TOTAL
1088.11k
1160.72k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4