| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i7-13700T


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
16/24
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
46.53k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
28.48k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
15.08k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
17.07k (x1.89)
TOTAL
72.04k
107.15k (x1.49)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
443.98k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
343.34k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
147.61k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
16.36k (x0.97)
TOTAL
1088.11k
951.3k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4