| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i9-11900H


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 1.9 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806d1
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
33.38k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
27.12k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
11.69k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
17k (x1.88)
TOTAL
72.04k
89.19k (x1.24)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
249.83k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
237.26k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
84.18k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
13.2k (x0.78)
TOTAL
1088.11k
584.47k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4