Core i9-10900X vs Xeon W-2223
Description
Both models i9-10900X and W-2223 are based on Cascade Lake architecture.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.6 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.6 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
50657
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
165 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
8448 kB
Date
November 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
25.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
20.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
5.07k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.76k (x1.02)
TOTAL
62.28k
59.68k (x0.96)
Multithread
i9-10900X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
111.43k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
100.2k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
24.67k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
6.89k (x0.26)
TOTAL
632.35k
243.18k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4