Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
165 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
17.57k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
27.38k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
9.35k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
23.9k (x2.77)
TOTAL
62.28k
78.2k (x1.26)
Multithread
i9-10900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
176.08k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
219.88k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
100k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
12.93k (x0.49)
TOTAL
632.35k
508.89k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4