Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
860f01
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
15.48k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
22.82k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
8.63k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
7.17k (x0.83)
TOTAL
62.28k
54.11k (x0.87)
Multithread
i9-10900X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
117.98k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
146.43k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
65.54k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
4.77k (x0.18)
TOTAL
632.35k
334.72k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4