| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i3-13100F


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b06f5
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
165 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
47.14k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
25.77k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
13.25k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
14.77k (x1.71)
TOTAL
62.28k
100.94k (x1.62)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
168.51k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
142.8k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
63.57k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
15.34k (x0.58)
TOTAL
632.35k
390.23k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4