| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.8 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
21.5k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
17.71k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
7.92k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
8.24k (x0.52)
TOTAL
90.37k
55.37k (x0.61)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
73.03k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
68.19k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
24.89k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
5.54k (x0.45)
TOTAL
825.47k
171.65k (x0.21)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4