| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 7.1 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
10/20
2/4
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
116.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
19.45k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
16.75k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
8.04k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
6.38k (x0.41)
TOTAL
90.37k
50.62k (x0.56)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
46.52k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
48.76k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
17.12k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
4.23k (x0.35)
TOTAL
825.47k
116.63k (x0.14)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4