Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7700X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a60f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM5
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
115.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
752.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
38.8k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
30.25k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
15.58k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
30.59k (x1.94)
TOTAL
90.37k
115.23k (x1.28)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
307.13k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
261.07k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
133.91k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
50.47k (x4.12)
TOTAL
825.47k
752.57k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
2925 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1275 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
481 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7167 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
7186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5603 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
5665 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
21338 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4