Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.6 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.6 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
17.57k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
27.38k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
9.35k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
23.9k (x1.52)
TOTAL
90.37k
78.2k (x0.87)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
176.08k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
219.88k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
100k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
12.93k (x1.06)
TOTAL
825.47k
508.89k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4