Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
15.34k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
25.75k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
5.79k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
17.95k (x1.14)
TOTAL
90.37k
64.83k (x0.72)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
123.07k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
239.3k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
60.6k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
8.18k (x0.67)
TOTAL
825.47k
431.14k (x0.52)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4