Core i9-10900KF vs i9-13900HX
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
b0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
10/20
24/32
TDP
125 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
1160.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
53.69k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
28.76k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
14.93k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
15.47k (x0.98)
TOTAL
90.37k
112.85k (x1.25)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
526.44k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
420.48k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
196.13k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
17.68k (x1.44)
TOTAL
825.47k
1160.72k (x1.41)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
21104 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4