| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i7-13700T


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
b0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
16/24
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
46.53k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
28.48k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
15.08k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
17.07k (x1.09)
TOTAL
90.37k
107.15k (x1.19)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
443.98k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
343.34k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
147.61k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
16.36k (x1.34)
TOTAL
825.47k
951.3k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4