| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i7-13700K


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-13700K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i7-13700K gets 1234.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700K is 1.5 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
b0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
16/24
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048+2x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
121.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
1234.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
53.98k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
31.5k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
16.52k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
19.78k (x1.26)
TOTAL
90.37k
121.79k (x1.35)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
574.06k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
435.61k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
211.31k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
13.69k (x1.12)
TOTAL
825.47k
1234.67k (x1.5)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
4592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
3485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
9877 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
9997 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
3059 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3664 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
22553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4